Let’s just get out of the way the fact that a lot of fans think The Rise of Skywalker was stupid. Star Wars fans generally have thought the latest Star Wars movie was stupid since Return of the Jedi. It really doesn’t matter what Star Wars fans say. Three trilogies are now complete, the saga is finished, and now fans can go enjoy their adorable Baby Yoda and not bother worrying about their idiot hypocrisy.
Anyway, Rise of Skywalker featured the return of the Emperor. This may be confusing since the Emperor returned, in the comics, years ago. Boba Fett returned in the comics years ago. Darth Maul was brought back long before he popped up at the end of Solo. These things happen. This particular return is somewhat less randomly nonsensical, and let me explain why:
In my personal favorite Star Wars film, Revenge of the Sith, the Emperor, slightly before he became the Emperor, had an illuminating discussion with Anakin Skywalker (best scene in Star Wars history), in which he explains what exactly sets the Sith apart from the Jedi. He says the Sith use the Force “in ways some might find unnatural,” while arguing that they could even prevent death itself. By the end of the movie he’s done exactly that, of course, transforming the horribly mutilated Anakin into Darth Vader. He also states that the Sith have the ability to create life itself.
In the movies, the life of Anakin Skywalker was never fully explained. There’s a theory that the Emperor actually used the Force to impregnate Shmi Skywalker. He likely did much the same to produce the heir who ended up rebelling and leaving Rey on Jakku. At the end of Return of the Jedi, the Emperor seems to have been killed. It’s equally likely he used the dark powers of the Sith to keep himself alive, but in a greatly compromised state, sort of like Voldemort in the Harry Potter saga, until he could find the power to revive himself. He states that all the previous Sith live on in him (he likely stole the Force from them, as he seems to from Mace Windu in Revenge of the Sith; “Unlimited power!), which might explain why he never has an apprentice who’s near his equal, in power or cunning, but also why he covets Anakin so much, because he alone seems to have anywhere near equal access to the Force, aside from Yoda. The ability to resist him is what scares the Emperor the most, because otherwise he always gets exactly what he wants.
Then Rey does what no one else could do, because in his arrogance the Emperor created the very conditions needed to defeat him. And to complete the irony, Rey rejects her lineage and embraces that of the man he literally created to ensure he would never lose his power. Well, yes, she is a Skywalker, if you really think about it...
2 comments:
The novelization says the Emperor is a clone and another clone of him was Rey's father. Rewatching the movies I wondered if Snoke was another Emperor clone, maybe one that got messed up in its growing. That would at least tie Snoke and the First Order to the Emperor in Rise of Skywalker.
Rewatching the prequels I also thought of the idea that Palpatine might have manipulated the midiclorines to cause the "vergence" that created Anakin. There would be some irony then in that he created the one who ultimately destroyed him.
As I was saying on Facebook recently, instead of "The Skywalker Saga" this should really be called "The Palpatine Saga" because with the Emperor's reappearance in Rise of Palpatine, er, Skywalker, he's central to each trilogy.
I can't help feeling that resurrecting characters is just flat-out narrative laziness. Snoke could have been developed far better than he was. Asajj Ventress is an awesome character and could just as easily have been the focus of the resurrected Darth Maul story. I get that comic books do it all the time. But that doesn't mean they should.
That said, I didn't hate the last movie the way a lot of people did. I still wish they'd found a different way.
Post a Comment