- George Washington (1789-1797) (+) The first and among the easiest consensus as being a positive influence on (father of) his country.
- John Adams (1797-1801) (+) These early Presidents almost by default achieved great things, regardless of how even partisan politics this soon threatened to smear their reputations. The second one was the first victim of this trend, but the dude was great by any reasonable standard.
- Thomas Jefferson (1801-1809) (+) The first politician to emerge as President, beneficiary of some of the greatest myth-making the country has ever seen, and probably deserves it.
- James Madison (1809-1817) (+) Arguably the guy who had the most heavy lifting of the early Presidents, at the end of the Founding Fathers era, left holding the bag on the perennially underappreciated War of 1812 climax.
- James Monroe (1817-1825) (+) Arguably the President who most ensured that the Civil War would eventually happen, but also the bridge between the foundation of the country and the next generation.
- John Quincy Adams (1825-1829) (+) Arguably better post-Presidency, where his role in attempting to hold the line of the country's moral character set the standard for which the Union was eventually preserved.
- Andrew Jackson (1829-1837) (-) Here's one of the most famous early Presidents, and the most famous post-Founders era, who solidified the role of petty politics for future generations.
- Martin Van Buren (1937-1841) (n) Jackson's appointed successor, knew enough not play the game in exactly the same way, likely figured that out when Jackson's policies ultimately proved disastrous.
- William Henry Harrison (1841) (n) Died almost instantly but election proved that the Jacksonian era was already being repudiated.
- John Tyler (1841-1845) (n) The politics of character assassination if you don't like the guy in office began with Tyler, "His Accidency," although in practice he proved that the system absolutely worked. However, after term in office, sullied legacy by signing up with the Confederacy.
- James Polk (1845-1849) (n) A strong record of expanding American territory ended up producing mixed results leading up to Civil War.
- Zachary Taylor (1849-1850) (n) Abbreviated term indicated a figure closer to Lincoln than might be expected from obscure legacy.
- Millard Fillmore (1850-1853) (-) The weakening Presidency meant great politicians were less likely to find themselves in the office, and the others only managed to dig deeper toward Civil War.
- Franklin Pierce (1853-1857) (-) Virtually guaranteed Civil War.
- James Buchanan (1857-1861) (-) Guaranteed Civil War.
- Abraham Lincoln (1861-1865) (+) After winning the war and subsequently being assassinated, elevated to sainthood, but at the time was considered the worst president ever. But now routinely considered the best. And he probably was.
- Andrew Johnson (1865-1869) (+) Everything everyone hated about Lincoln was basically dumped on this guy, given the thankless task of Reconstruction. And so the petty politics that almost ruined Lincoln, ended up being Johnson's legacy. Undeservedly.
- Ulysses S. Grant (1869-1877) (+) Politics were broken well before the Civil War, but somehow everyone likes to blame Grant for the state of affairs he and his predecessor had to deal with. The fact that the Union held together and we of course still have it today is proof enough that no matter how difficult the process, his and Johnson's work was a success.
- Rutherford B. Hayes (1877-1881) (+) So thankless a task was Reconstruction that hardly anyone knows this guy even existed today.
- James A. Garfield (1881) (n) Another brief Presidency and the second assassination, and all he ended up doing was proving how ridiculous politics are.
- Chester Arthur (1881-1885) (+) A quiet plus here for having the bravery to represent political reform, which at this point was clearly badly needed.
- Grover Cleveland (1885-1889) (1893-1897) (-) The only nonconsecutive two-term President thus far, he was kind of the personification of the Republican Party's degeneracy, signaling the first cracks that would eventually shatter under Democratic pressure, in fact the party's first (and second) office holder since the Civil War.
- Benjamin Harrison (1889-1893) (n) The Republicans had this guy in between the Cleveland administrations, but he ended up being blamed for a recession. Maybe the Civil War had something to do with that?
- William McKinley (1897-1901) (+) A return to a more confident Presidency, at last.
- Theodore Roosevelt (1901-1909) (+) Literally enshrined on Mount Rushmore. The last of the strong Presidents until, well, his cousin.
- William Taft (1909-1913) (+) Teddy was pretty annoyed that his chosen successor wasn't enough like him. But close enough.
- Woodrow Wilson (1913-1921) (-) Democratic Party mythmaking began with this guy, praised as the genius behind the League of Nations, but also the guy Teddy Roosevelt openly despised. I tend to agree with Teddy. Also not famous enough for being the bastard who actually screened Birth of a Nation at the White House.
- Warren Harding (1921-1923) (-) A weak President at pretty much the worst time. Probably most responsible for the Great Depression.
- Calvin Coolidge (1923-1929) (-) Harding and Coolidge were literally the Great Depression versions of pre-Civil War Presidents.
- Herbert Hoover (1929-1933) (+) Blamed for the Great Depression. Which was ridiculous. Immediately set about an FDR-type program. Which didn't even work for FDR until WWII.
- Franklin Roosevelt (1933-1945) (+) Deserves praise not so much for the New Deal as the brilliant prosecution of WWII.
- Harry Truman (1945-1953) (-) The asshole who actually dropped not one but two atomic bombs. History will eventually get around to condemning him.
- Dwight Eisenhower (1953-1961) (+) Perhaps the last President not to be defined wholly by his political affiliation. Thankless task of handling the early Cold War.
- John Kennedy (1961-1963) (+) The last great man in office.
- Lyndon Johnson (1963-1969) (+) Everything good he did was following the Kennedy playbook.
- Richard Nixon (1969-1974) (+) Angered political opponents mostly for successfully completing the ideas of his immediate predecessors (who were technically party rivals).
- Gerald Ford (1974-1977) (n) Sort of proved how harmless the Nixon administration really was. And that's about it.
- Jimmy Carter (1977-1981) (-) Perhaps a really great person, but a terrible President.
- Ronald Reagan (1981-1989) (+) Ushered in the modern era by ending the Cold War. Every Democratic Party candidate ever since has had to pretend this didn't happen. And we're somehow actually letting that work.
- George Bush (1989-1993) (+) Put the finishing touches on Reagan's administration.
- Bill Clinton (1993-2001) (n) It's hard to know what exactly he accomplished. He inherited an economy primed by the accomplishments of his immediate predecessors. And generally still gets all the credit.
- George W. Bush (2001-2009) (+) The thankless task of leading the country post-9/11. And his opponents almost immediately politicized it.
- Barack Obama (2009-2017) (n) Hard to know what he really accomplished yet.
- Donald Trump (2017-present) (n) Hard to know what he's really accomplished yet. Political strife not a legitimate determinant.
Saturday, February 22, 2020
US Presidents
I'm not going to attempt to rank them much less come up with some definitive top ten of the very best. A lot of it is completely relative as it is, although there were some who were mere officeholders and some who attempted great things, some who were caught up in hard times and some who rode good times. So I'm going to give some thoughts to all the US Presidents, including a +, -, or n, for neutral, indication of their overall impact (with the two most recent receiving that distinction, as it's far too early to rationally judge them).
Labels:
politics
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
7 comments:
Maybe you can get this linked on Breitbart or Info Wars. LOL
I'll accept that as a valid response.
This is quite an excellent brief description of each president and hard to keep the personal view separate from the actual politics. I think Bill Clinton deserves a + because he was able to place the finishing touches on the budget to actually bring the U.S. into the black. Bush Jnr would get a - for bringing the U.S. back into the red plus creating the major cracks in the U.S. beginning to lose their world power status. Obama did start having health care which you need since so many come to our country to get basics drugs like insulin. Trump gets a - because the loss of respect, from around the world, the U.S. is now facing leads to bigger holes in their super power status. It won't be in our life time, but the cracks are there where the U.S. like all their previous super powers before(Italy, China, Mongolia(Ghingas Kahn), Spain, Holland, Britain) will fall.
This is an admirable survey. I don't agree with all of it but I admire the effort. The post-Jackson 19th century, save Lincoln, is a tough slog!
Birgit, the trends at least in the last several hundred years have seen successive revolutions mostly feeding off each other. If it didn't happen to the US when the USSR fell apart, the reports of its imminent demise are greatly exaggerated. And it didn't happen even during the Great Depression, or during the Civil War. There's a curious resiliency built into the country that has so far survived what has brought down a lot of other countries. But let's not get cocky, right?
Squid, there's a lot of unconventional thought in it, I admit, and a lot that would need a lot more than a blurb to explain the thought process. I've been reading a book on US history that's had me second-guessing myself, but on the whole I stand by my reasoning.
Fair enough. You're a lot more charitable to recent Republicans than I could ever be. I'm glad you sent some love Arthur's way, though. He was a Vermonter by birth. Everyone expected him to be a puppet for moneyed interests but turned out to have plenty of backbone. Created the civil service.
A very comprehensive overview!
Post a Comment