I admit that I first heard Living Colour's song "Cult of Personality" as wrestler CM Punk's entrance music. The song is about charismatic people who trick other people into following them, their charisma often masking their true identities as ruthless dictators. The 20th century was awash in the cult of personality. Here in the 21st century, a lot of people have decided that a much-maligned US president was destined to join the ranks of the cult of personality. But the thing is, the US presidency is somewhat...immune from what Living Colour was singing about. There're just too many checks and balances in place. No matter how big the personality and no matter the character of the cult, the system keeps the president within reasonable confines.
But that doesn't mean the cult of personality has nothing to do with the presidency.
I'm here to argue that the most surefire way to win the presidency is by cult of personality. Simply put, the biggest personality invariably wins on election day. It doesn't matter how the personality is defined. The biggest, the best, the most easily defined personality wins. I defy you to name an election outcome that contradicts this.
Within living memory, Kennedy famously bested Nixon because he was better on camera, and a whole mythology soon followed, even if he became incredibly contentious, capped off by the assassination that has become his chief legacy. Johnson (who in personality was pretty much exactly the equal of the current president, although media coverage greatly diverges) didn't have to worry about campaigning, since he essentially acted as Kennedy's surrogate until he decided he wouldn't run again, at which point Nixon no longer had a problem of rivals. Then the Democrats found their next surrogate Kennedy (Carter, followed by Clinton, followed by Obama). Republicans had a movie star(ish) in Reagan (H.W. Bush slipped in one term essentially riding his coattails), and then W. Bush won over a robot with a lockbox (and later, too late, an environmental messiah complex).
Reasonably, the current president had no real competition. His rival in the election was the Clinton with no personality. It'd've been a far different story if Clinton had run with Clinton (just imagine!). Instead we have an endless bemoaning of the (latest) end of the world. And yet, the presidency remains the same as ever, and...will anyone figure out how these elections are really won?
If history proves anything, no. But campaigns can produce counterfeit cults. Isn't that really the whole idea?
6 comments:
Ha ha ok. The current president just spent six days arguing about a gaffe over a hurricane's path and getting everyone from NOAA to an admiral to defend his gaffe. Yup, same as ever.
As someone who lived through the massive uncertainties of Dorian's path, I see no reason to take seriously everything that has been reported about it. Tracking storms seems to be a lot of guesswork, no matter how educated. I don't get how it can be someone's job to figure out what's going to happen, and there to be so much waffling about it, just to make sure no one is criticized if they get it wrong. You can be right about anything if you have literally every possible outcome on the table. It's absurd.
Scary thought.
So many strong personalities crying havoc for power. I'm not a fan of politics and yet the 2016 Donald Trump campaign was a beaut. So lets examine the 2016 campaign closely, In law there is a thing known as "doctrine of clean hands" the Clintons had all that terrible donation pr exposure to explain and the email business which made them look bad, bad, bad. Trump was no angel but was clever at taking the heat but largely got dumped by media news entities and Orla TV owned by Carlos Slim for not playing ball in the entertainment industry. The whole setup smells of spoiled fish if you as me.
I liked your blog very much and started to follow.
I'm waiting for you on my blog.
I will be very happy if you follow
https://dizifilmkitaptavsiye.blogspot.com/
My friend, I have nominated you for a Sunshine Blogger Award: https://armchairsquid.blogspot.com/2019/12/sunshine-blogger-award.html. I have made important alterations to the "rules" for the award:
- You don't have to display anything you don't want to.
- You don't have to pass on the award to others in order to accept it for yourself. You are thoroughly deserving without having to jump through any hoops.
- You also don't have to answer my questions, though I hope you will. I am genuinely interested in your responses.
- Simply know that I am grateful for our blogosphere friendship.
Post a Comment